广告
提示
工具简介
fat-serstaff.com 通过本站PING检测服务借助全球分布的节点网络,来模拟用户从不同地理位置对网站进行访问时的网络延迟状况,实时反馈目标网站的响应速度与连接稳定性。
PING检测结果fat-serstaff.com2026-10-04 01:25:10
预估消耗 0 检测点,实际消耗以【检测点账单】为准
29

检测节点

响应时间分布 域名污染分布

污染比例:0%

登录51CESU,立即查看域名污染全国分布情况
立即登录
概览 被污染 (0) 状态码4XX (0) 客户端请求错误(请求的资源不存在、权限不足等) 状态码5XX (0) 服务器故障,处理请求时内部出错无法访问 响应超时 (1) 丢包 (0)
区域/运营商 响应最快 响应最慢 平均响应
全部 上海移动130.151ms -206.45ms 170.396ms
电信 福建漳州电信157.01ms 新疆乌鲁木齐电信193.716ms 170.248ms
移动 上海移动130.151ms 西藏拉萨移动195.219ms 164.302ms
联通 安徽亳州联通161.101ms -206.45ms 177.799ms
华东 上海移动130.151ms 山东济南联通175.681ms 155.414ms
华北 山西长治移动155.052ms -206.45ms 172.382ms
华南 海南三亚联通171.215ms 海南三亚联通171.215ms 171.215ms
华中 河南驻马店联通177.737ms 河南驻马店联通177.737ms 177.737ms
西北 宁夏银川移动172.28ms 新疆乌鲁木齐电信193.716ms 179.468ms
西南 重庆移动164.399ms 西藏拉萨移动195.219ms 175.419ms
东北 辽宁大连移动169.018ms 吉林长春联通193.447ms 181.501ms
解析占比
全部 电信 移动 联通 被污染
38.49.6.200

38.49.6.200
解析失败
Ping检测详情
全部
响应超时 被污染 丢包
节点数:/
检测点
运营商 检测节点
解析IP 丢包率

最大时间

最小时间

平均时间

操作
电信 天津
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 179.496 ms 162.452 ms 167.834 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=0 ttl=49 time=163.184 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=1 ttl=49 time=165.160 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=2 ttl=49 time=162.452 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=3 ttl=49 time=168.880 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=4 ttl=49 time=179.496 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 162.452/167.834/179.496 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
电信 福建漳州
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 158.142 ms 156.551 ms 157.01 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=158.142 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=156.551 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=156.756 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=156.648 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=156.954 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4260ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 156.551/157.010/158.142/0.581 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
电信 河北唐山
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 163.366 ms 162.239 ms 162.758 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=163.366 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=162.748 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=162.685 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=162.239 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=162.752 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4179ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 162.239/162.758/163.366/0.359 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
电信 吉林长春
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 175.678 ms 175.181 ms 175.44 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=175.678 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=175.181 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=175.642 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=175.392 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=175.307 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4269ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 175.181/175.440/175.678/0.192 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
电信 新疆乌鲁木齐
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 193.935 ms 193.613 ms 193.716 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=193.681 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=193.935 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=193.613 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=193.661 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=193.691 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4282ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 193.613/193.716/193.935/0.112 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
电信 重庆
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 165.509 ms 164.095 ms 164.73 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=165.509 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=164.606 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=165.036 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=164.406 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=164.095 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4258ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 164.095/164.730/165.509/0.494 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 甘肃庆阳
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 174.13 ms 170.942 ms 172.407 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=174.130 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=173.642 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=171.431 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=170.942 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=171.889 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4198ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 170.942/172.407/174.130/1.253 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 广东肇庆
响应超时 0% * ms * ms * ms

发送:0

接收:0

包大小:64

详情:
fat-serstaff.com: resolve host "fat-serstaff.com": lookup fat-serstaff.com: i/o timeout
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 贵州黔南布依族苗族自治州
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 168.926 ms 168.5 ms 168.695 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=168.926 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=168.654 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=168.890 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=168.500 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=168.504 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4235ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 168.500/168.695/168.926/0.182 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 河北唐山
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 170.119 ms 169.54 ms 169.815 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=170.119 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=169.942 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=169.733 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=169.743 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=169.540 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4263ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 169.540/169.815/170.119/0.198 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 江苏无锡
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 139.736 ms 139.388 ms 139.571 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=139.736 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=139.589 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=139.645 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=139.388 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=139.499 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4150ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 139.388/139.571/139.736/0.119 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 辽宁大连
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 169.561 ms 168.617 ms 169.018 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=169.561 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=168.617 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=169.000 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=168.969 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=168.942 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4236ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 168.617/169.018/169.561/0.304 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 宁夏银川
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 177.798 ms 170.636 ms 172.28 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=170.636 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=177.798 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=170.976 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=170.729 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=171.261 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4252ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 170.636/172.280/177.798/2.767 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 山东滨州
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 153.983 ms 152.475 ms 153.295 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=153.535 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=152.475 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=152.980 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=153.983 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=153.500 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4229ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 152.475/153.295/153.983/0.518 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 山西长治
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 155.344 ms 154.912 ms 155.052 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=155.344 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=154.924 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=155.037 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=155.044 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=154.912 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4249ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 154.912/155.052/155.344/0.155 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 上海
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 131.714 ms 129.559 ms 130.151 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=129.559 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=129.582 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=130.326 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=131.714 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=129.574 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4227ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 129.559/130.151/131.714/0.834 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 四川攀枝花
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 181.945 ms 181.208 ms 181.716 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=181.945 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=181.841 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=181.208 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=181.922 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=181.663 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4218ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 181.208/181.716/181.945/0.272 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 西藏拉萨
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 195.451 ms 195.035 ms 195.219 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=195.451 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=195.185 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=195.130 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=195.035 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=195.291 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4257ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 195.035/195.219/195.451/0.142 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
移动 重庆
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 164.961 ms 164.232 ms 164.399 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=164.961 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=164.232 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=164.312 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=164.249 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=164.243 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4252ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 164.232/164.399/164.961/0.282 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 北京
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 206.729 ms 206.343 ms 206.45 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=0 ttl=44 time=206.729 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=1 ttl=44 time=206.343 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=2 ttl=44 time=206.434 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=3 ttl=44 time=206.359 ms
64 bytes from 38.49.6.200: seq=4 ttl=44 time=206.387 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 206.343/206.450/206.729 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 安徽亳州
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 161.296 ms 161.024 ms 161.101 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=161.078 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=161.296 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=161.037 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=161.070 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=161.024 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4184ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 161.024/161.101/161.296/0.099 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 福建泉州
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 164.384 ms 164.001 ms 164.231 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=164.001 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=164.232 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=164.250 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=164.286 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=164.384 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4256ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 164.001/164.231/164.384/0.126 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 海南三亚
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 171.448 ms 171.097 ms 171.215 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=171.448 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=171.143 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=171.097 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=171.169 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=171.215 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4251ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 171.097/171.215/171.448/0.123 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 河南驻马店
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 178.379 ms 176.993 ms 177.737 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=177.463 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=177.603 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=178.379 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=178.249 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=176.993 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4246ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 176.993/177.737/178.379/0.514 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 吉林长春
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 194.044 ms 192.834 ms 193.447 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=193.286 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=193.146 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=194.044 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=193.927 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=192.834 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4227ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 192.834/193.447/194.044/0.464 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 辽宁大连
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 188.337 ms 187.839 ms 188.098 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=188.006 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=188.075 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=187.839 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=188.231 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=188.337 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4219ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 187.839/188.098/188.337/0.173 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 山东济南
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 175.828 ms 175.557 ms 175.681 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=175.828 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=175.557 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=175.694 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=175.587 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=175.739 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4271ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 175.557/175.681/175.828/0.099 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 云南昆明
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 177.999 ms 177.61 ms 177.757 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=177.999 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=177.782 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=177.731 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=177.610 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=177.663 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4190ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 177.610/177.757/177.999/0.134 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING
联通 浙江温州
38.49.6.200 (美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶ASN block not managed by the RIPE NCC)
0% 163.663 ms 160.987 ms 162.273 ms

发送:5

接收:5

包大小:64

详情:
PING fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=162.920 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=160.987 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=161.407 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=163.663 ms
64 bytes from fat-serstaff.com (38.49.6.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=162.387 ms

--- fat-serstaff.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4215ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 160.987/162.273/163.663/0.976 ms
详情
详情 HTTP DNS PING

查询结果仅供参考,不保证100%准确。

fat-serstaff.com 优化建议

1、针对检测结果,建议优先优化网络延迟测试,应使用在线ping工具持续监控并优化平均响应时间,尤其需关注峰值延迟对网站ping延迟检测的影响。
2、建议利用多地区网站ping检测功能,重点分析美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶节点的在线pingip地址表现,结合多线路ping测试数据优化服务器延迟测试策略。
3、建议部署网站ping状态检测机制,对未返回数据的节点进行远程网站ping检测排查,通过免费网站ping检测完善网站ping连通性检测覆盖,并加强网站ping响应时间检测力度。

其他工具历史

更新时间 2026-10-04 04:42:03
广告
广告